Insights on AI art critique, portfolio development, and what it takes to compete at the highest levels.
Machine learning analysis of Pablo Picasso's Buste de Femme (1938). Overall score: 90/100 — Concept & Intent leads at 95, a deliberate deconstruction of the human form into fractured, psychologically charged planes.
Read Article →Machine learning analysis of Lucian Freuds Sleeping by the Lion Carpet (1995). Overall score: 88/100 — see how the trained rubric scores technical execution, composition, originality, and 5 other dimensions.
Read Article →Machine learning analysis of Banksy's 2003 street art mural. Overall score: 92/100. Concept & Intent leads at 95 — the radical gesture substitution is the entire argument.
Read Article →Studio Praxis scores Wassily Kandinsky's 1925 Bauhaus landmark at 91/100. Technical Execution leads at 95, while its deliberate compositional tension introduces a formal friction that challenges seamless resolution.
Read Article →Machine learning analysis of Jean-Michel Basquiat's Untitled, 1982. Overall score: 88/100. Eight dimensions applied to one of the most studied works of the Neo-Expressionist movement.
Read Article →Machine learning analysis of David Hockney's 1977 double portrait. Overall score: 98/100. The rubric finds extraordinary cohesion between psychological observation and technical control.
Read Article →A structured eight-dimension critique of Georgia O'Keeffe's Jimson Weed using the Studio Praxis machine learning model.
Read Article →What separates accepted MFA portfolios from rejected ones? Here's what admissions committees evaluate—and how to make sure your work measures up.
Read Article →The art world runs on subjective feedback. "It's interesting." "Maybe try something different." But what if an machine algos could give you something more concrete?
Read Article →A personal test run of the Studio Praxis rubric on an original painting. 78/100 — see which dimensions held up and which revealed real gaps.
Read Article →